Nervenschwäche und Krieg | Buchdaten, Inhalt und Autor
09/06/2026
Lesedauer: 13 min
Nervenschwäche und Krieg von Hans-Georg Hofer im Überblick mit Inhalt, Buchdaten und Einordnung. Öffne die Seite für einen schnellen Faktencheck zum Buch.

Alles Wichtige zu Nervenschwäche und Krieg
Wer nach einem Buch von Hans-Georg Hofer aus dem Themenfeld Sachbuch sucht, findet mit Nervenschwäche und Krieg eine Ausgabe mit präziser inhaltlicher Positionierung. Die Kurzbeschreibung von Nervenschwäche und Krieg zeigt, welche Inhalte Leserinnen und Leser erwarten dürfen: Since the 1880s neurasthenia - a term popularised by New York-physician George Beard - was discussed an a phenomenon of modernity, but over a long period of debate, psychiatry were not able to define what this "modern malady" exactly meant nor was it able to find any discernible causes for the epidemic disease. Neurasthenia was not simply a diagnostic term, which was often applied by fin de siècle-physicians to their workaday routine, but a kind of lifestyle, a sign of a certain emotional sensitivity in modern times. In the last decade historical research on neurasthenia has focused on Britain, Germany and the Netherlands. But what happened in Austria-Hungary, especially in Vienna? Focusing on Viennese psychiatry, part one of the book analyses the "invention" of Neurasthenia and the adoption of Beards thesis in Austrian medicine, bringing out various figures and alternative methods of explanations of the disease that was identified as a central, yet unwanted feature of modern manliness. Based on this the outcome of war could be seen as an instance of 'nerve-corrections'. Like many medical professionals in Austria-Hungary, psychiatrists had reacted to the war with nearly unanimous support: patriotic habits went hand in hand with high psychiatric expectations of the powerful mental effects of war. These hopes were badly disappointed. In the more recent literature on the medical and cultural history of the Great War, the phenomenon of the epidemic mental breakdowns of soldiers has been given a prominent place. 'Shellshock' and 'war neurosis' are now key words and frequent metaphors for the shattering effects of an industrialized war. In a sense these psychiatric labels symbolically represent the destructive impact of mechanized weapons on body and soul, the loss of narrative structures and the traumatic after-effects of modern warfare. How can Viennese-centred Austrian psychiatry in the First World War be characterized? With regard to new studies on the history of trauma, war and psychiatry I intend to emphasize two interpretations. Firstly, as in German and other European psychiatric war communities, models of rationalisation and modernisation are of significance when focusing on this topic. Viennese psychiatrists were neither particularly brutal nor especially tolerant in the way they dealt with the situation. Instead, as in other European countries in the Great War, they acted in keeping with military requirements and standards. Secondly, the specific political and cultural context of the Austro-Hungarian situation is of utmost importance as well. Shell-shock was a phenomenon that affected all nations, but reactions differed according to different national traditions and different medical ways of understanding, representing and acting. In a comparative cultural history of World War One, Austria-Hungary is a model of a shattered society, paralysed by ethnic conflicts and cultural differences. In this context, the therapeutic response to war neurosis was affected by language confusion, national stereotypes and malingering. The German-Austrian psychiatrists not only emerged as a group of experts who had taken responsibility for the efficient treatment of war neurosis, but also as a pressure group that intended to keep centrifugal forces of the multinational empire under control Bibliografisch ist Nervenschwäche und Krieg mit dem Erscheinungsdatum 2004, dem Verlag Böhlau und dem Ort xx erfasst.
Einordnung nach Autor, Thema und Ausgabe
Nervenschwäche und Krieg spricht besonders Nutzer an, die sich für Bücher rund um Sachbuch interessieren. Verlagsname und Verlagsort - Böhlau und xx - helfen dabei, die Ausgabe eindeutig zu identifizieren. Nervenschwäche und Krieg liegt in Deutsch vor, was für die inhaltliche Nutzung ebenso wichtig ist wie für die bibliografische Suche. Für alle, die Bücher von Hans-Georg Hofer recherchieren oder vergleichen, ist Nervenschwäche und Krieg eine relevante Ausgabe. Mit dem Erscheinungszeitpunkt 2004 lässt sich Nervenschwäche und Krieg sauber in einen bibliografischen Kontext einordnen.
Was behandelt Nervenschwäche und Krieg?
Wer wissen möchte, worauf Nervenschwäche und Krieg inhaltlich abzielt, findet in dieser Zusammenfassung einen ersten Ansatzpunkt: Since the 1880s neurasthenia - a term popularised by New York-physician George Beard - was discussed an a phenomenon of modernity, but over a long period of debate, psychiatry were not able to define what this "modern malady" exactly meant nor was it able to find any discernible causes for the epidemic disease. Neurasthenia was not simply a diagnostic term, which was often applied by fin de siècle-physicians to their workaday routine, but a kind of lifestyle, a sign of a certain emotional sensitivity in modern times. In the last decade historical research on neurasthenia has focused on Britain, Germany and the Netherlands. But what happened in Austria-Hungary, especially in Vienna? Focusing on Viennese psychiatry, part one of the book analyses the "invention" of Neurasthenia and the adoption of Beards thesis in Austrian medicine, bringing out various figures and alternative methods of explanations of the disease that was identified as a central, yet unwanted feature of modern manliness. Based on this the outcome of war could be seen as an instance of 'nerve-corrections'. Like many medical professionals in Austria-Hungary, psychiatrists had reacted to the war with nearly unanimous support: patriotic habits went hand in hand with high psychiatric expectations of the powerful mental effects of war. These hopes were badly disappointed. In the more recent literature on the medical and cultural history of the Great War, the phenomenon of the epidemic mental breakdowns of soldiers has been given a prominent place. 'Shellshock' and 'war neurosis' are now key words and frequent metaphors for the shattering effects of an industrialized war. In a sense these psychiatric labels symbolically represent the destructive impact of mechanized weapons on body and soul, the loss of narrative structures and the traumatic after-effects of modern warfare. How can Viennese-centred Austrian psychiatry in the First World War be characterized? With regard to new studies on the history of trauma, war and psychiatry I intend to emphasize two interpretations. Firstly, as in German and other European psychiatric war communities, models of rationalisation and modernisation are of significance when focusing on this topic. Viennese psychiatrists were neither particularly brutal nor especially tolerant in the way they dealt with the situation. Instead, as in other European countries in the Great War, they acted in keeping with military requirements and standards. Secondly, the specific political and cultural context of the Austro-Hungarian situation is of utmost importance as well. Shell-shock was a phenomenon that affected all nations, but reactions differed according to different national traditions and different medical ways of understanding, representing and acting. In a comparative cultural history of World War One, Austria-Hungary is a model of a shattered society, paralysed by ethnic conflicts and cultural differences. In this context, the therapeutic response to war neurosis was affected by language confusion, national stereotypes and malingering. The German-Austrian psychiatrists not only emerged as a group of experts who had taken responsibility for the efficient treatment of war neurosis, but also as a pressure group that intended to keep centrifugal forces of the multinational empire under control Ergänzend helfen die hinterlegten Schlagwörter dabei, Nervenschwäche und Krieg thematisch schneller einzuordnen: History, Psychological aspects, Psychology, Psychiatry, War, Military Medicine, Psychiatrie, Eerste Wereldoorlog, Neurasthenie, Oorlogvoering
Wichtige Kennzeichen dieser Ausgabe
Die Open-Library-Zuordnung über OL20933633W und OL28360728M verbessert die externe Nachvollziehbarkeit des Werkes. Die Ausgabe ist über den Verlag Böhlau, den Ort xx und das Datum 2004 klar kontextualisiert.
Wichtige Buchdaten im Überblick
- Kurzbeschreibung: Since the 1880s neurasthenia - a term popularised by New York-physician George Beard - was discussed an a phenomenon of modernity, but over a long period of debate, psychiatry were not able to define what this "modern malady" exactly meant nor was it able to find any discernible causes for the epidemic disease. Neurasthenia was not simply a diagnostic term, which was often applied by fin de siècle-physicians to their workaday routine, but a kind of lifestyle, a sign of a certain emotional sensitivity in modern times. In the last decade historical research on neurasthenia has focused on Britain, Germany and the Netherlands. But what happened in Austria-Hungary, especially in Vienna? Focusing on Viennese psychiatry, part one of the book analyses the "invention" of Neurasthenia and the adoption of Beards thesis in Austrian medicine, bringing out various figures and alternative methods of explanations of the disease that was identified as a central, yet unwanted feature of modern manliness. Based on this the outcome of war could be seen as an instance of 'nerve-corrections'. Like many medical professionals in Austria-Hungary, psychiatrists had reacted to the war with nearly unanimous support: patriotic habits went hand in hand with high psychiatric expectations of the powerful mental effects of war. These hopes were badly disappointed. In the more recent literature on the medical and cultural history of the Great War, the phenomenon of the epidemic mental breakdowns of soldiers has been given a prominent place. 'Shellshock' and 'war neurosis' are now key words and frequent metaphors for the shattering effects of an industrialized war. In a sense these psychiatric labels symbolically represent the destructive impact of mechanized weapons on body and soul, the loss of narrative structures and the traumatic after-effects of modern warfare. How can Viennese-centred Austrian psychiatry in the First World War be characterized? With regard to new studies on the history of trauma, war and psychiatry I intend to emphasize two interpretations. Firstly, as in German and other European psychiatric war communities, models of rationalisation and modernisation are of significance when focusing on this topic. Viennese psychiatrists were neither particularly brutal nor especially tolerant in the way they dealt with the situation. Instead, as in other European countries in the Great War, they acted in keeping with military requirements and standards. Secondly, the specific political and cultural context of the Austro-Hungarian situation is of utmost importance as well. Shell-shock was a phenomenon that affected all nations, but reactions differed according to different national traditions and different medical ways of understanding, representing and acting. In a comparative cultural history of World War One, Austria-Hungary is a model of a shattered society, paralysed by ethnic conflicts and cultural differences. In this context, the therapeutic response to war neurosis was affected by language confusion, national stereotypes and malingering. The German-Austrian psychiatrists not only emerged as a group of experts who had taken responsibility for the efficient treatment of war neurosis, but also as a pressure group that intended to keep centrifugal forces of the multinational empire under control
- Buchtitel: Nervenschwäche und Krieg
- ISBN-10: 3205772148
- Schlagwörter: History, Psychological aspects, Psychology, Psychiatry, War, Military Medicine, Psychiatrie, Eerste Wereldoorlog, Neurasthenie, Oorlogvoering
- Verfügbare Sprache dieser Ausgabe: Deutsch
- Erscheinungsdatum: 2004
- Externe Work-Referenz: OL20933633W
- Thematische Hauptkategorie: Sachbuch
- Open-Library-Editions-IDs: OL28360728M
- Publiziert bei: Böhlau
- Umfang: 454 Seiten
- Ort der Veröffentlichung: xx
- Autor beziehungsweise Autoren: Hans-Georg Hofer
Warum sich Nervenschwäche und Krieg gut einordnen lässt
Nervenschwäche und Krieg profitiert für die Auffindbarkeit besonders von der Verbindung zwischen Hans-Georg Hofer, Sachbuch und den Tags History, Psychological aspects, Psychology, Psychiatry, War, Military Medicine, Psychiatrie, Eerste Wereldoorlog, Neurasthenie, Oorlogvoering, weil dadurch eine starke semantische Einordnung entsteht.
Häufige Fragen zu Nervenschwäche und Krieg
Was sagt die Beschreibung über das Buch aus?
Since the 1880s neurasthenia - a term popularised by New York-physician George Beard - was discussed an a phenomenon of modernity, but over a long period of debate, psychiatry were not able to define what this "modern malady" exactly meant nor was it able to find any discernible causes for the epidemic disease. Neurasthenia was not simply a diagnostic term, which was often applied by fin de siècle-physicians to their workaday routine, but a kind of lifestyle, a sign of a certain emotional sensitivity in modern times. In the last decade historical research on neurasthenia has focused on Britain, Germany and the Netherlands. But what happened in Austria-Hungary, especially in Vienna? Focusing on Viennese psychiatry, part one of the book analyses the "invention" of Neurasthenia and the adoption of Beards thesis in Austrian medicine, bringing out various figures and alternative methods of explanations of the disease that was identified as a central, yet unwanted feature of modern manliness. Based on this the outcome of war could be seen as an instance of 'nerve-corrections'. Like many medical professionals in Austria-Hungary, psychiatrists had reacted to the war with nearly unanimous support: patriotic habits went hand in hand with high psychiatric expectations of the powerful mental effects of war. These hopes were badly disappointed. In the more recent literature on the medical and cultural history of the Great War, the phenomenon of the epidemic mental breakdowns of soldiers has been given a prominent place. 'Shellshock' and 'war neurosis' are now key words and frequent metaphors for the shattering effects of an industrialized war. In a sense these psychiatric labels symbolically represent the destructive impact of mechanized weapons on body and soul, the loss of narrative structures and the traumatic after-effects of modern warfare. How can Viennese-centred Austrian psychiatry in the First World War be characterized? With regard to new studies on the history of trauma, war and psychiatry I intend to emphasize two interpretations. Firstly, as in German and other European psychiatric war communities, models of rationalisation and modernisation are of significance when focusing on this topic. Viennese psychiatrists were neither particularly brutal nor especially tolerant in the way they dealt with the situation. Instead, as in other European countries in the Great War, they acted in keeping with military requirements and standards. Secondly, the specific political and cultural context of the Austro-Hungarian situation is of utmost importance as well. Shell-shock was a phenomenon that affected all nations, but reactions differed according to different national traditions and different medical ways of understanding, representing and acting. In a comparative cultural history of World War One, Austria-Hungary is a model of a shattered society, paralysed by ethnic conflicts and cultural differences. In this context, the therapeutic response to war neurosis was affected by language confusion, national stereotypes and malingering. The German-Austrian psychiatrists not only emerged as a group of experts who had taken responsibility for the efficient treatment of war neurosis, but also as a pressure group that intended to keep centrifugal forces of the multinational empire under control
Wer sollte sich für Nervenschwäche und Krieg interessieren?
Besonders relevant ist Nervenschwäche und Krieg für Leserinnen und Leser, die nach Literatur aus dem Bereich Sachbuch suchen oder gezielt Veröffentlichungen von Hans-Georg Hofer betrachten möchten.
Wie lässt sich das Buch sprachlich und thematisch filtern?
Über die Sprache Deutsch und die Schlagwörter History, Psychological aspects, Psychology, Psychiatry, War, Military Medicine, Psychiatrie, Eerste Wereldoorlog, Neurasthenie, Oorlogvoering kann die Ausgabe gezielt in Such- und Katalogsystemen eingegrenzt werden.
Gibt es externe Referenzdaten für das Werk?
Ja, das Werk ist über die Open-Library-Work-ID OL20933633W sowie die Editions-IDs OL28360728M referenzierbar.
Externe Links
Hier findest du weitere ausgewählte Links.
