Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption | Autor, ISBN und Ausgabedetails
31/07/2026
Lesedauer: 13 min
Hier findest du zu Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption von Sture Packalén die wichtigsten Infos zur Ausgabe. Klicke für klare Fakten statt vager Kurztexte.
Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption von Sture Packalén - Informationen zur Ausgabe
Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption von Sture Packalén ist ein Titel aus dem Bereich Sachbuch, der thematisch klar positioniert ist und für Leserinnen und Leser mit Interesse an diesem Fach- oder Themengebiet besonders relevant sein kann. Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption wird in der Beschreibung wie folgt charakterisiert: The dissertation examines from a non-German and politically independent position the view of Hölderlin in the literary productive reception in the Federal Republic and the GDR during the years 1949-1981, given the assumption of a Hölderlin renaissance at the end of the 1960s and during the 1970s. From a comprehensive reception-aesthetical perspective which regards reception as a dialogue between a classic and a contemporary author, the questions are asked, In which significant connections is Hölderlin topical? and How has interest for him been reflected in literary works about him? The reception of Hölderlin from the Goethe Period up to and including the present as well as the emergence and growth of a socialistic conception of Hölderlin are sketched in a historical retrospect. Against the background of the view in both German states of the classical German heritage and Hölderlin's position in it, the factors which in the 1970s led to a topicalization as well as a changed horizon of expectation vis-a-vis the poet are described. An interpretation of selected examples of the productive reception - Peter Härtling, Stephan Hermlin, Peter Weiss, Gerhard Wolf and several lyricists - shows how the picture of Hölderlin in literature develops and how this picture reflects the spirit of the times in today's divided Germany. In the Federal Republic during the 1950s the view of Hölderlin was traditionally laudatory. This was replaced during the the '60s by a questioning and social-critical reception. This tendency continued during the '70s when the poet was seen both as a revolutionary sympathizer and as a medium for self-understanding during a time of political resignation. In the GDR the sparse literary reception of Hölderlin during the ‘50s and the ‘60s was principally approving and apolitical. From 1970 onwards the reception followed two lines: the official, state authorized view according to which Hölderlin’s revolutionary visions have been realized in the GDR and an unofficial view which regard him as a confrère and as a polemic medium for system criticism. The interest for Hölderlin in both of the German states has two dimensions. On the one hand, there is an affirmative component which seeks to preserve the traditionally promulgated view of him; on the other hand, there is an emancipative component which seeks to crush it and assert a changed, social-critical and identificational conception of him. A synchronic analysis shows how during the ‘70s the conceptions of Hölderlin in the West and East (educated bourgeois, legitimistic, identificational-intermediary and formal-aesthetic) both coexist and succeed each other. Beyond the ideologically conditioned divergencies in the views of Hölderlin in the divided Germany, it is possible to discern a set of unifying areas of agreement. Besides the poet’s literary mastery, the common denominator in these points of accord is the personal appreciation of Hölderlin both as a hope-giving paragon of artistic self-understanding and as a symbol of failure in the embodiment of an outsider Die Ausgabe erschien am 1986 bei S. Academiae Ubsaliensis und ist dem Verlagsstandort [Uppsala] zugeordnet.
Relevante Merkmale auf einen Blick
Gerade wer nach Werken von Sture Packalén sucht, sollte Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption näher betrachten. Der Verlag S. Academiae Ubsaliensis und der Verlagsort [Uppsala] liefern zusätzliche Orientierung bei der Einordnung dieser Ausgabe. Auch das Veröffentlichungsdatum 1986 macht Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption für zeitlich eingegrenzte Suchen besonders interessant. Durch die Zuordnung zur Kategorie Sachbuch wird Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption auch für thematische Recherchen besonders relevant. Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption liegt in Deutsch vor, was für die inhaltliche Nutzung ebenso wichtig ist wie für die bibliografische Suche.
Inhalte, Themen und Relevanz
Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption lässt sich inhaltlich innerhalb von Sachbuch verorten und wird in der Beschreibung wie folgt umrissen: The dissertation examines from a non-German and politically independent position the view of Hölderlin in the literary productive reception in the Federal Republic and the GDR during the years 1949-1981, given the assumption of a Hölderlin renaissance at the end of the 1960s and during the 1970s. From a comprehensive reception-aesthetical perspective which regards reception as a dialogue between a classic and a contemporary author, the questions are asked, In which significant connections is Hölderlin topical? and How has interest for him been reflected in literary works about him? The reception of Hölderlin from the Goethe Period up to and including the present as well as the emergence and growth of a socialistic conception of Hölderlin are sketched in a historical retrospect. Against the background of the view in both German states of the classical German heritage and Hölderlin's position in it, the factors which in the 1970s led to a topicalization as well as a changed horizon of expectation vis-a-vis the poet are described. An interpretation of selected examples of the productive reception - Peter Härtling, Stephan Hermlin, Peter Weiss, Gerhard Wolf and several lyricists - shows how the picture of Hölderlin in literature develops and how this picture reflects the spirit of the times in today's divided Germany. In the Federal Republic during the 1950s the view of Hölderlin was traditionally laudatory. This was replaced during the the '60s by a questioning and social-critical reception. This tendency continued during the '70s when the poet was seen both as a revolutionary sympathizer and as a medium for self-understanding during a time of political resignation. In the GDR the sparse literary reception of Hölderlin during the ‘50s and the ‘60s was principally approving and apolitical. From 1970 onwards the reception followed two lines: the official, state authorized view according to which Hölderlin’s revolutionary visions have been realized in the GDR and an unofficial view which regard him as a confrère and as a polemic medium for system criticism. The interest for Hölderlin in both of the German states has two dimensions. On the one hand, there is an affirmative component which seeks to preserve the traditionally promulgated view of him; on the other hand, there is an emancipative component which seeks to crush it and assert a changed, social-critical and identificational conception of him. A synchronic analysis shows how during the ‘70s the conceptions of Hölderlin in the West and East (educated bourgeois, legitimistic, identificational-intermediary and formal-aesthetic) both coexist and succeed each other. Beyond the ideologically conditioned divergencies in the views of Hölderlin in the divided Germany, it is possible to discern a set of unifying areas of agreement. Besides the poet’s literary mastery, the common denominator in these points of accord is the personal appreciation of Hölderlin both as a hope-giving paragon of artistic self-understanding and as a symbol of failure in the embodiment of an outsider Ergänzend helfen die hinterlegten Schlagwörter dabei, Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption thematisch schneller einzuordnen: History and criticism, German literature, In literature, Appreciation
Ausgabe, Identifikatoren und Referenzen
Die Ausgabe ist über den Verlag S. Academiae Ubsaliensis, den Ort [Uppsala] und das Datum 1986 klar kontextualisiert. Für weiterführende bibliografische Verknüpfungen sind die Kennungen OL4910346W und OL2327352M besonders hilfreich.
Bibliografische Daten auf einen Blick
- Titel: Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption
- Open-Library-Work-ID: OL4910346W
- Schlagwörter: History and criticism, German literature, In literature, Appreciation
- Umfang: 307 Seiten
- ISBN-10: 9155418295
- Autor beziehungsweise Autoren: Sture Packalén
- Verlagsort: [Uppsala]
- Open-Library-Editions-IDs: OL2327352M
- Publiziert bei: S. Academiae Ubsaliensis
- Verfügbare Sprache dieser Ausgabe: Deutsch
- Kurzbeschreibung: The dissertation examines from a non-German and politically independent position the view of Hölderlin in the literary productive reception in the Federal Republic and the GDR during the years 1949-1981, given the assumption of a Hölderlin renaissance at the end of the 1960s and during the 1970s. From a comprehensive reception-aesthetical perspective which regards reception as a dialogue between a classic and a contemporary author, the questions are asked, In which significant connections is Hölderlin topical? and How has interest for him been reflected in literary works about him? The reception of Hölderlin from the Goethe Period up to and including the present as well as the emergence and growth of a socialistic conception of Hölderlin are sketched in a historical retrospect. Against the background of the view in both German states of the classical German heritage and Hölderlin's position in it, the factors which in the 1970s led to a topicalization as well as a changed horizon of expectation vis-a-vis the poet are described. An interpretation of selected examples of the productive reception - Peter Härtling, Stephan Hermlin, Peter Weiss, Gerhard Wolf and several lyricists - shows how the picture of Hölderlin in literature develops and how this picture reflects the spirit of the times in today's divided Germany. In the Federal Republic during the 1950s the view of Hölderlin was traditionally laudatory. This was replaced during the the '60s by a questioning and social-critical reception. This tendency continued during the '70s when the poet was seen both as a revolutionary sympathizer and as a medium for self-understanding during a time of political resignation. In the GDR the sparse literary reception of Hölderlin during the ‘50s and the ‘60s was principally approving and apolitical. From 1970 onwards the reception followed two lines: the official, state authorized view according to which Hölderlin’s revolutionary visions have been realized in the GDR and an unofficial view which regard him as a confrère and as a polemic medium for system criticism. The interest for Hölderlin in both of the German states has two dimensions. On the one hand, there is an affirmative component which seeks to preserve the traditionally promulgated view of him; on the other hand, there is an emancipative component which seeks to crush it and assert a changed, social-critical and identificational conception of him. A synchronic analysis shows how during the ‘70s the conceptions of Hölderlin in the West and East (educated bourgeois, legitimistic, identificational-intermediary and formal-aesthetic) both coexist and succeed each other. Beyond the ideologically conditioned divergencies in the views of Hölderlin in the divided Germany, it is possible to discern a set of unifying areas of agreement. Besides the poet’s literary mastery, the common denominator in these points of accord is the personal appreciation of Hölderlin both as a hope-giving paragon of artistic self-understanding and as a symbol of failure in the embodiment of an outsider
- Erscheinungsdatum: 1986
- Primäre Kategorie: Sachbuch
Suchrelevante Merkmale dieser Ausgabe
Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption profitiert für die Auffindbarkeit besonders von der Verbindung zwischen Sture Packalén, Sachbuch und den Tags History and criticism, German literature, In literature, Appreciation, weil dadurch eine starke semantische Einordnung entsteht.
Fragen und Antworten rund um diese Ausgabe
Was sagt die Beschreibung über das Buch aus?
The dissertation examines from a non-German and politically independent position the view of Hölderlin in the literary productive reception in the Federal Republic and the GDR during the years 1949-1981, given the assumption of a Hölderlin renaissance at the end of the 1960s and during the 1970s. From a comprehensive reception-aesthetical perspective which regards reception as a dialogue between a classic and a contemporary author, the questions are asked, In which significant connections is Hölderlin topical? and How has interest for him been reflected in literary works about him? The reception of Hölderlin from the Goethe Period up to and including the present as well as the emergence and growth of a socialistic conception of Hölderlin are sketched in a historical retrospect. Against the background of the view in both German states of the classical German heritage and Hölderlin's position in it, the factors which in the 1970s led to a topicalization as well as a changed horizon of expectation vis-a-vis the poet are described. An interpretation of selected examples of the productive reception - Peter Härtling, Stephan Hermlin, Peter Weiss, Gerhard Wolf and several lyricists - shows how the picture of Hölderlin in literature develops and how this picture reflects the spirit of the times in today's divided Germany. In the Federal Republic during the 1950s the view of Hölderlin was traditionally laudatory. This was replaced during the the '60s by a questioning and social-critical reception. This tendency continued during the '70s when the poet was seen both as a revolutionary sympathizer and as a medium for self-understanding during a time of political resignation. In the GDR the sparse literary reception of Hölderlin during the ‘50s and the ‘60s was principally approving and apolitical. From 1970 onwards the reception followed two lines: the official, state authorized view according to which Hölderlin’s revolutionary visions have been realized in the GDR and an unofficial view which regard him as a confrère and as a polemic medium for system criticism. The interest for Hölderlin in both of the German states has two dimensions. On the one hand, there is an affirmative component which seeks to preserve the traditionally promulgated view of him; on the other hand, there is an emancipative component which seeks to crush it and assert a changed, social-critical and identificational conception of him. A synchronic analysis shows how during the ‘70s the conceptions of Hölderlin in the West and East (educated bourgeois, legitimistic, identificational-intermediary and formal-aesthetic) both coexist and succeed each other. Beyond the ideologically conditioned divergencies in the views of Hölderlin in the divided Germany, it is possible to discern a set of unifying areas of agreement. Besides the poet’s literary mastery, the common denominator in these points of accord is the personal appreciation of Hölderlin both as a hope-giving paragon of artistic self-understanding and as a symbol of failure in the embodiment of an outsider
Welche Verlagsangaben sind vorhanden?
Hinterlegt sind das Erscheinungsdatum 1986, der Verlag S. Academiae Ubsaliensis und der Verlagsort [Uppsala].
Wie lässt sich Zum Hölderlinbild in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR, anhand ausgewählter Beispiele der produktiven Hölderlin-Rezeption thematisch einordnen?
Die Ausgabe wird dem Bereich Sachbuch zugeordnet und ist damit für thematisch fokussierte Recherchen gut geeignet.
Wie lässt sich das Buch sprachlich und thematisch filtern?
Über die Sprache Deutsch und die Schlagwörter History and criticism, German literature, In literature, Appreciation kann die Ausgabe gezielt in Such- und Katalogsystemen eingegrenzt werden.
Externe Links
Hier findest du weitere ausgewählte Links.

