CROSSTOWN Books

Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike - Buchdetails zu Autor, Inhalt und ISBN

17/07/2026

Lesedauer: 8 min

Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike von Guido Pfeifer auf einen Blick: Buchprofil, Inhalt und zentrale Daten. Nützlich für alle, die gezielt prüfen statt nur überfliegen wollen.

Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike - Buchdetails zu Autor, Inhalt und ISBN

Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike - Buchdetails zu Autor, Inhalt und ISBN

Alles Wichtige zu Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike

Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike von Guido Pfeifer ist ein Titel aus dem Bereich Sachbuch, der thematisch klar positioniert ist und für Leserinnen und Leser mit Interesse an diesem Fach- oder Themengebiet besonders relevant sein kann. Die vorhandene Beschreibung macht deutlich, worauf Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike den Fokus legt: Antiquity is often utilized as a reference to provide a historical dimension for contemporary phenomena. This also holds true for the prevailing scientific discourse on alternative or adequate remedies of dispute resolution. In this context, historical perspectives seem to be in vogue as narratives to legitimize one or another role model, whereas studies on practical examples from ancient legal orders tend not to be given serious consideration in the current debate. Just as in the case of contemporary legal research, ancient legal history also distinguishes litigation at court from other mechanisms of conflict resolution. Nevertheless, where do the boundaries of judicial and extra-judicial mechanisms of dispute resolution lie within the framework of ancient societies? Are they alternatives in a narrower sense? Is there evidence for concerning the reason there was no (or at least no exclusive) judicial decision? This volume offers a selection of studies of pertinent illustrative material pertaining to these questions. While the relevant sources stemming from the prehistorical period, the Ancient Near East, Hellenistic Egypt and Classical Roman law may vary greatly, this just serves to widen our perspective on ancient times. Heidi Peter-Röcher focuses on strategies of conflict resolution in prehistoric times corresponding to different forms of violence. Hans Neumann, Susanne Paulus, Lena Fija?kowska and Alessandro Hirata delve into case studies situated in the Ancient Near East from Sumerian to Neo-Babylonian times. Three other contributions examine Graeco-Roman Antiquity: Marc Depauw considers non-Greek, i.e., demotic, material from a Hellenistic kingdom, Anna Seelentag embraces the phenomenon of public clamour in the Roman Republic, and Christine Lehne-Gstreinthaler provides a fresh look at the classical arbitration from the perspective of ancient legal history

Was diese Ausgabe besonders interessant macht

Innerhalb von Sachbuch bietet Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike eine klar erkennbare thematische Zuordnung. Der Verlag Max Planck Institute for European Legal History und der Verlagsort Frankfurt am Main liefern zusätzliche Orientierung bei der Einordnung dieser Ausgabe. Im Kontext des Gesamtwerks von Guido Pfeifer lässt sich Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike gezielt bibliografisch und thematisch einordnen. Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike liegt in Deutsch vor, was für die inhaltliche Nutzung ebenso wichtig ist wie für die bibliografische Suche.

Worum geht es in Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike?

Im thematischen Kontext von Sachbuch setzt Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike laut Beschreibung auf folgende Schwerpunkte: Antiquity is often utilized as a reference to provide a historical dimension for contemporary phenomena. This also holds true for the prevailing scientific discourse on alternative or adequate remedies of dispute resolution. In this context, historical perspectives seem to be in vogue as narratives to legitimize one or another role model, whereas studies on practical examples from ancient legal orders tend not to be given serious consideration in the current debate. Just as in the case of contemporary legal research, ancient legal history also distinguishes litigation at court from other mechanisms of conflict resolution. Nevertheless, where do the boundaries of judicial and extra-judicial mechanisms of dispute resolution lie within the framework of ancient societies? Are they alternatives in a narrower sense? Is there evidence for concerning the reason there was no (or at least no exclusive) judicial decision? This volume offers a selection of studies of pertinent illustrative material pertaining to these questions. While the relevant sources stemming from the prehistorical period, the Ancient Near East, Hellenistic Egypt and Classical Roman law may vary greatly, this just serves to widen our perspective on ancient times. Heidi Peter-Röcher focuses on strategies of conflict resolution in prehistoric times corresponding to different forms of violence. Hans Neumann, Susanne Paulus, Lena Fija?kowska and Alessandro Hirata delve into case studies situated in the Ancient Near East from Sumerian to Neo-Babylonian times. Three other contributions examine Graeco-Roman Antiquity: Marc Depauw considers non-Greek, i.e., demotic, material from a Hellenistic kingdom, Anna Seelentag embraces the phenomenon of public clamour in the Roman Republic, and Christine Lehne-Gstreinthaler provides a fresh look at the classical arbitration from the perspective of ancient legal history Für die thematische Suche und semantische Zuordnung sind insbesondere diese Tags relevant: Ancient history: to c 500 CE

Ausgabe, Identifikatoren und Referenzen

Die Open-Library-Zuordnung über OL20927902W und OL28354532M, OL28354533M verbessert die externe Nachvollziehbarkeit des Werkes.

Die zentralen Metadaten zu Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike

  1. Titel: Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike
  2. Publiziert bei: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History
  3. Primäre Kategorie: Sachbuch
  4. Open-Library-Work-ID: OL20927902W
  5. Seitenzahl: 182
  6. Sprache: Deutsch
  7. Verfasst von: Guido Pfeifer
  8. Schlagwörter: Ancient history: to c 500 CE
  9. Inhaltliche Kurzcharakteristik: Antiquity is often utilized as a reference to provide a historical dimension for contemporary phenomena. This also holds true for the prevailing scientific discourse on alternative or adequate remedies of dispute resolution. In this context, historical perspectives seem to be in vogue as narratives to legitimize one or another role model, whereas studies on practical examples from ancient legal orders tend not to be given serious consideration in the current debate. Just as in the case of contemporary legal research, ancient legal history also distinguishes litigation at court from other mechanisms of conflict resolution. Nevertheless, where do the boundaries of judicial and extra-judicial mechanisms of dispute resolution lie within the framework of ancient societies? Are they alternatives in a narrower sense? Is there evidence for concerning the reason there was no (or at least no exclusive) judicial decision? This volume offers a selection of studies of pertinent illustrative material pertaining to these questions. While the relevant sources stemming from the prehistorical period, the Ancient Near East, Hellenistic Egypt and Classical Roman law may vary greatly, this just serves to widen our perspective on ancient times. Heidi Peter-Röcher focuses on strategies of conflict resolution in prehistoric times corresponding to different forms of violence. Hans Neumann, Susanne Paulus, Lena Fija?kowska and Alessandro Hirata delve into case studies situated in the Ancient Near East from Sumerian to Neo-Babylonian times. Three other contributions examine Graeco-Roman Antiquity: Marc Depauw considers non-Greek, i.e., demotic, material from a Hellenistic kingdom, Anna Seelentag embraces the phenomenon of public clamour in the Roman Republic, and Christine Lehne-Gstreinthaler provides a fresh look at the classical arbitration from the perspective of ancient legal history
  10. Externe Editionsreferenzen: OL28354532M, OL28354533M
  11. Verlagsort: Frankfurt am Main
  12. Internationale Standardbuchnummer (ISBN-13): 9783944773087

Auffindbarkeit und bibliografische Präzision

Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike profitiert für die Auffindbarkeit besonders von der Verbindung zwischen Guido Pfeifer, Sachbuch und den Tags Ancient history: to c 500 CE, weil dadurch eine starke semantische Einordnung entsteht.

FAQ zu Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike

Welche Open-Library-Kennungen sind vorhanden?

Vorhanden sind die Work-ID OL20927902W und die Editionsreferenzen OL28354532M, OL28354533M.

Wer sollte sich für Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike interessieren?

Besonders relevant ist Außergerichtliche Kon?iktlösung in der Antike für Leserinnen und Leser, die nach Literatur aus dem Bereich Sachbuch suchen oder gezielt Veröffentlichungen von Guido Pfeifer betrachten möchten.

Gibt es eine inhaltliche Zusammenfassung?

Ja, die Beschreibung fasst die Ausrichtung des Buches so zusammen: Antiquity is often utilized as a reference to provide a historical dimension for contemporary phenomena. This also holds true for the prevailing scientific discourse on alternative or adequate remedies of dispute resolution. In this context, historical perspectives seem to be in vogue as narratives to legitimize one or another role model, whereas studies on practical examples from ancient legal orders tend not to be given serious consideration in the current debate. Just as in the case of contemporary legal research, ancient legal history also distinguishes litigation at court from other mechanisms of conflict resolution. Nevertheless, where do the boundaries of judicial and extra-judicial mechanisms of dispute resolution lie within the framework of ancient societies? Are they alternatives in a narrower sense? Is there evidence for concerning the reason there was no (or at least no exclusive) judicial decision? This volume offers a selection of studies of pertinent illustrative material pertaining to these questions. While the relevant sources stemming from the prehistorical period, the Ancient Near East, Hellenistic Egypt and Classical Roman law may vary greatly, this just serves to widen our perspective on ancient times. Heidi Peter-Röcher focuses on strategies of conflict resolution in prehistoric times corresponding to different forms of violence. Hans Neumann, Susanne Paulus, Lena Fija?kowska and Alessandro Hirata delve into case studies situated in the Ancient Near East from Sumerian to Neo-Babylonian times. Three other contributions examine Graeco-Roman Antiquity: Marc Depauw considers non-Greek, i.e., demotic, material from a Hellenistic kingdom, Anna Seelentag embraces the phenomenon of public clamour in the Roman Republic, and Christine Lehne-Gstreinthaler provides a fresh look at the classical arbitration from the perspective of ancient legal history

Welche Sprache und Schlagwörter sind hinterlegt?

Verzeichnet sind die Sprache Deutsch sowie die Tags Ancient history: to c 500 CE, die die thematische Zuordnung erleichtern.

Weitere Artikel zu
diesem Thema